![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Извините, что не перевожу, но статья: а) больно большая, чтобы переводить; б) больно интересная, чтобы не поделиться.
Она - о двух, казалось бы, диаметрально далёких друг от друга вещах: об абстрактном искусстве и о конкретной разведке. Или даже, скорее, о подрывной работе. Материалу почти двадцать лет, но как свежо и актуально!
Скрал тут, в Индепенденте.
Hot stuff: Jackson Pollock
The connection is improbable. This was a period, in the 1950s and 1960s, when the great majority of Americans disliked or even despised modern art - President Truman summed up the popular view when he said: "If that's art, then I'm a Hottentot." As for the artists themselves, many were ex- communists barely acceptable in the America of the McCarthyite era, and certainly not the sort of people normally likely to receive US government backing.
Why did the CIA support them? Because in the propaganda war with the Soviet Union, this new artistic movement could be held up as proof of the creativity, the intellectual freedom, and the cultural power of the US. Russian art, strapped into the communist ideological straitjacket, could not compete.
( Read more... )
Такие вот пирожки со скунсами... И поговорите мне ещё об "агентах влияния" как о выдумке "Кровавого Эльфийского Режима"™ :)). А потом мы, в узком кругу друзей, можем побеседовать об "эффекте бумеранга" и о том, что бесплатных ланчей так уж 100% не бывает.
Она - о двух, казалось бы, диаметрально далёких друг от друга вещах: об абстрактном искусстве и о конкретной разведке. Или даже, скорее, о подрывной работе. Материалу почти двадцать лет, но как свежо и актуально!
Скрал тут, в Индепенденте.
Modern art was CIA 'weapon' Абстрактное искусство было "оружием" ЦРУ :)
For decades in art circles it was either a rumour or a joke, but now it is confirmed as a fact. The Central Intelligence Agency used American modern art - including the works of such artists as Jackson Pollock, Robert Motherwell, Willem de Kooning and Mark Rothko - as a weapon in the Cold War. In the manner of a Renaissance prince - except that it acted secretly - the CIA fostered and promoted American Abstract Expressionist painting around the world for more than 20 years.Hot stuff: Jackson Pollock
The connection is improbable. This was a period, in the 1950s and 1960s, when the great majority of Americans disliked or even despised modern art - President Truman summed up the popular view when he said: "If that's art, then I'm a Hottentot." As for the artists themselves, many were ex- communists barely acceptable in the America of the McCarthyite era, and certainly not the sort of people normally likely to receive US government backing.
Why did the CIA support them? Because in the propaganda war with the Soviet Union, this new artistic movement could be held up as proof of the creativity, the intellectual freedom, and the cultural power of the US. Russian art, strapped into the communist ideological straitjacket, could not compete.
( Read more... )
Такие вот пирожки со скунсами... И поговорите мне ещё об "агентах влияния" как о выдумке "Кровавого Эльфийского Режима"™ :)). А потом мы, в узком кругу друзей, можем побеседовать об "эффекте бумеранга" и о том, что бесплатных ланчей так уж 100% не бывает.
